Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 +74%
1.089 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
480
Shading Units
336
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.34 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1089 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GF114
Turks GL
GPU Variant
GF114-325-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy