Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 670 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 670 +322%
2.634 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1344
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
170W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GK104
Turks GL
GPU Variant
GK104-325-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy