Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA L20

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA L20

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 48GB VRAM L20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
11296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
L20 +9411%
59.35 TFLOPS
VS
L20

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Nov 2023
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
92
480
Shading Units
11776
24
TMUs
368
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
92
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
927.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.35 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
59.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
927.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
AD102
Turks GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy