Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +1500%
0.624 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
480
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT218
Turks GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy