Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 PCI

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3450 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3450 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +1200%
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3450 PCI
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV620
Turks GL
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy