Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1757MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5500 XT +765%
5.398 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1187 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1757 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.22 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
168.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.80 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.398 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
337.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 14
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy