Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +1622%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Aug 2018
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Vega 10
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy