Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +677%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Hawaii
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy