Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1905MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5700 XT +1463%
9.754 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1605 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1905 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.9 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
304.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.51 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.754 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
609.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 10
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XT (215-0917210)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy