Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 132W)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2491MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6600 +1330%
8.928 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Oct 2021
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1626 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2491 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.4 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.86 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.928 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
558.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
132W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 23
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Navi 23 XL (215-130000016)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy