Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT +3690%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
May 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
335W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 21
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy