Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 7500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2300MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7500 XT +1409%
9.421 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1452 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2300 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.60 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
147.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.84 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.421 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
294.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 33
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Navi 33
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy