Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB +75%
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
TU117
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy