Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FireMV 2260

ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FireMV 2260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800 +1450%
0.62 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
2
400
Shading Units
40
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV620
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy