Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE

ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2581MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6750 GRE +2030%
13.21 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2321 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2581 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
40
400
Shading Units
2560
20
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
40
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.2 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
413.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.43 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.21 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
825.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 22
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 22 KXT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy