Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FirePro V7900

ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +199%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
20
400
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Cayman
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy