Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (69W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 +20%
0.749 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
5
Compute Units
-
400
Shading Units
288
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GF114
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy