Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 +940%
6.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
5
Compute Units
-
400
Shading Units
1920
20
TMUs
120
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
TU106
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
TU106-200A-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy