Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
5744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +12980%
81.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3300 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
96
400
Shading Units
6144
20
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
633.6 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1267 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
162.2 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 31
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX+
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
355W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy