Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP

ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1950 GT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (57W vs 69W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
-
400
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV570
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
RV570 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
57W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x Molex

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy