Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +1606%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
480
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
33W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT218
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy