Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +13%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT200B
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy