Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +450%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
20
480
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 14
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy