Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520 +860%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Dec 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
36
480
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 12
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 12
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy