Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 7700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 245W)
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2544MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7700 XT +4479%
35.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2544 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
54
480
Shading Units
3456
24
TMUs
216
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
54
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
244.2 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
549.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
70.34 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1099 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 32
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32 XL (215-180000076)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
245W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy