Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +115%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
10
480
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy