Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV530
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy