Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +691%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220 OEM
0.097 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.048 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.096 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
97.15 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT215
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
58W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy