Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +252%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GA107
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy