Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +660%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

56W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy