Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 56W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +599%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

56W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy