Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE +79%
1.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
10
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.76 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1101 GFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cayman LE WS
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy