Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750 +67%
0.512 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2012
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GK107
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy