Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

ATI FirePro V7750 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +269%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy