ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 76W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2243%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
320
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
76W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV730
GPU Name
AD107
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
