Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI FirePro V7800 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +55%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
12
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy