Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800P vs NVIDIA PG506 232

ATI FirePro V7800P vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800P and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (138W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800P
2.016 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +411%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1440
Shading Units
3584
72
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

138W
TDP
165W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GA100
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy