Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800P vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

ATI FirePro V7800P vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800P and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (138W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800P
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +103%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
32
1440
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

138W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy