Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +53%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
TU106
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy