Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 XT +136%
4.394 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1074 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy