Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +628%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
1280
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
AD107
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy