Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs ATI Radeon X1650

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV516
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy