Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +546%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
AD107
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy