Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +3244%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
1280
Shading Units
16896
80
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GB100
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
208 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy