Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV380
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy