Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro V4900

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +141%
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
6
1280
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Turks
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy