Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050
1.862 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
1280
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GP107
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy