Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +11%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy