Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand +41%
2.634 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
1344
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GK104
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK104-325-A2
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
170W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy