Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1755MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM +335%
8.087 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1515 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.16 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
126.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.087 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.087 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
126.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GA106
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GA106-150-KA-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
12 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy